Home » Healthcare » 1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central.

1 The retractions came only a few months after BioMed Central.

A third reason may be that journals and publishers are increasingly multinational. In the past, the editor and editorial board of a journal understood both scientific field it protected and the people working in it, but it’s almost impossible to end up being sufficiently well linked when both editors and submissions result from across the world. Having authors suggest the best reviewers may seem like a good idea therefore. In the aftermath of the latest scandals involving fake peer reviewers, many journals are determined to turn off the reviewer-suggestion option on their manuscript-submission systems. But that move might not be enough, as the publisher Hindawi discovered this past springtime. Although Hindawi doesn’t allow authors suggest reviewers for their manuscripts, it decided to examine the peer-review records for manuscripts submitted in 2013 and 2014 for possible fraud.From very in early stages, these organisations have repeatedly stated that the outbreak will not be contained without a massive upsurge in medical and epidemiological help. The Ebola virus and its own progression The Ebola virus and the Marburg virus are filoviruses, research which started with discovery of the Marburg virus in 1967. Study in this area that has been completed in Germany has considerably contributed to understanding the nature of the Ebola virus. This analysis furthermore delivered important methods to control and combat the virus, such as the procedures to identify the virus which are becoming applied by the European Mobile phone Laboratory in today’s outbreak.